[Fluxus] usefulness for audio?

plutek infinity plutek at infinity.net
Sat Oct 25 06:43:24 PDT 2014


On 2014-10-25 06:05, David Griffiths wrote:
> On 25/10/14 03:10, plutek infinity wrote:
>> so, i'm interested in thoughts any of you might have about the
>> possibility of fluxus+fluxa really being a viable environment for 
>> what
>> i'm doing; my sense is that it's a real stretch to think that it's 
>> truly
>> appropriate -- which is truly a shame, because it is just simply 
>> such a
>> beautiful and intuitive thing!  :(
>
> Fluxa was really only intended as an experiment in a possible way of
> doing audio, rather than a do-everything production type of thing. 
> I'm
> still using it for slub gigs quite a lot, but trying to keep it small
> than add too many features.
>
> I would agree with Peter that overtone is probably a good balance for 
> a
> more complete environment with a lisp interface (also with a really
> active community), but it would be good to see more diversity in this 
> area.

thanks a lot, guys... Overtone does look very interesting, and i hadn't 
heard about it! neither of you mentioned ChucK... any thoughts?

(beginning Overtone installation...)  :)

cheers!
.pltk.



More information about the Fluxus mailing list