[Fluxus] usefulness for audio?
plutek infinity
plutek at infinity.net
Sat Oct 25 06:43:24 PDT 2014
On 2014-10-25 06:05, David Griffiths wrote:
> On 25/10/14 03:10, plutek infinity wrote:
>> so, i'm interested in thoughts any of you might have about the
>> possibility of fluxus+fluxa really being a viable environment for
>> what
>> i'm doing; my sense is that it's a real stretch to think that it's
>> truly
>> appropriate -- which is truly a shame, because it is just simply
>> such a
>> beautiful and intuitive thing! :(
>
> Fluxa was really only intended as an experiment in a possible way of
> doing audio, rather than a do-everything production type of thing.
> I'm
> still using it for slub gigs quite a lot, but trying to keep it small
> than add too many features.
>
> I would agree with Peter that overtone is probably a good balance for
> a
> more complete environment with a lisp interface (also with a really
> active community), but it would be good to see more diversity in this
> area.
thanks a lot, guys... Overtone does look very interesting, and i hadn't
heard about it! neither of you mentioned ChucK... any thoughts?
(beginning Overtone installation...) :)
cheers!
.pltk.
More information about the Fluxus
mailing list