[Fluxus] port abuse

[Kassen]

>
>
> This is exactly the kind of direction I'd like fluxus to go in - I see
> no reason that we can't gradually rewrite the entire editor in scheme
> using our primitives. This would mean we could do a lot more work on the
> presentation of the code and errors...
>
>
So, Fluxus will eventually be like Emacs, except that our build-in Tetris
will look better?

This will be great! Vi/Emacs debates won't have a thing on the debates about
a Lisp-based editor v.s. a Scheme-based one!



... and if you are finding new and exciting ways of crashing, it's a
> good indication that you are onto something interesting!
>
>
At the very least I'm on to more advanced references than introductions to
Scheme; that's interesting. I'm also learning a lot. I'm learning a lot of
Scheme and every day I learn that what I tried the last was way too
complicated and that it can be done in a far more simple way. That's really
quite interesting too, compared to the many systems where things keep
getting more and more complicated instead. :-)

Yours,
Kas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pawfal.org/pipermail/fluxus-pawfal.org/attachments/20100824/6734559d/attachment.html>