[Fluxus] drscheme vs. mred vs. emacs

[Scott]

Hey Chris,

I use fluxus with MrEd and Emacs exclusively.

This is in my .emacs:
(setq scheme-program-name "mred-text -i -t
/usr/local/collects/fluxus-016/drflux.ss")

But most of the time, I end up doing a ^UM-xrun-scheme and deleting the -t
option, so when I "run-scheme" it just does a "mred-text -i"

Then in my scheme file, typically the first line is:
(require fluxus-016/drflux)

Which then gets the whole fluxus thing working...

Either way will work... I do the latter cuz sometimes I want change things
up before firing up fluxus.

All interaction then will be through your subordinate scheme window... which
is good if 1) like me you like emacs and/or 2) you don't want the scratchpad
visible while you code.

Hope that helps!
-Scott

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:49 AM, chris kummerer <chris at lo-res.org> wrote:

> hi,
>
> (I realize it's getting boring, but I still had to shelve working with
> fluxus again for various reasons, now on vacation I have time enough but:)
>
> if I use drflux.ss in drscheme and run it I get a repl and as a simple test
> (build-cube) works as expected, using drflux.ss from mred (via -z -t
> drflux.ss)
> yields a black window but mred never returns to the repl prompt, could
> someone
> enlighten me how to get the fluxus repl to work from mred and thus emacs ?
>
> TIA
>
> x
>
> --
> chris at lo-res.org        Postmodernism is german romanticism with better
> http://pilot.fm/        special effects. (Jeff Keuss / via ctheory.net)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pawfal.org/pipermail/fluxus-pawfal.org/attachments/20090915/16c57417/attachment.html>