[fluxus] and you, apply?

[dave]

my bad - happens when you write a binding for a language before you know
it... :) we need to fix this

I'll change apply to apply-transform.

so we also have source - which does what load does (I think) in normal
scheme, and load, which loads it into the editor. so what shall we
change this to - edit?

let me know if there are there any others.

On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 15:07 +0100, nik gaffney wrote:
> > basicly the same problem as with "load": how do i get the original  
> > scheme's "apply" back?
> 
> this looks like a nameclash, in that if you change apply in FluxusBindings to
> something like apply-transform you should get the r5rs function back as well as
> beiong able to 'apply' transforms.
> 
> i would agree thats its probably not a good idea to redefine any of the standard
> scheme keywords..
> 
> nk
> _______________________________________________
> fluxus mailing list
> fluxus at lists.pawfal.org
> http://lists.pawfal.org/listinfo.cgi/fluxus-pawfal.org